Ordinary Meeting of
Council - 05 December 2019 - Open Minutes
Apologies
Nil
Conflicts of interest
Councillor Hayley Browne declared an interest in Item 9. In
order to manage this interest she did not participate in the discussion or
vote.
Public forum
Graeme Robinson
Graeme spoke in relation to the Civic and administration
building and his 2011 seismic assessment report and design calculations,
presented to the Chief Executive (copy of his speech attached – Appendix
A).
In response to questions from Councillors, he noted the
following:
·
He didn’t believe that the peer review report provided to
Councillors ahead of the meeting included the Civic building, only the library
building.
·
The Strata Group reports did not appear to be held on the
property file.
·
He confirmed that his report had been peer reviewed by three
engineers.
·
The coefficient number (sideways push on the building) does not
appear to be included in the Strata Group report and he doesn’t see how
they can work out whether the building will survive or not without this number.
Tyne Nelson and Emma Koch on behalf of Zero Waste
Network
Tyne and Emma spoke in relation to sustainability and waste
and noted that the current landfill is adequate for the time being (copy of
presentation attached – Appendix B).
In response to questions from Councillors, they noted that
separation of waste is key and education is important to try to change
people’s view of waste. We need to help people to see it as a resource.
Announcements by
the Mayor including any discussion of minor matters not on the agenda
There were no announcements by the Mayor.
In calling for any minor matters not on the agenda, Deputy
Mayor Annette Brosnan advised that she would provide an update on the Waipatiki
Project at the end of the meeting.
Announcements by
the management
Nil
Confirmation of minutes
|
Council resolution
|
Councillors Boag / Taylor
That the Draft
Minutes of the Ordinary meeting held on 19 November 2019 be confirmed as a
true and accurate record of the meeting.
|
Agenda
Items
1. Stormwater
Bylaw 2020
|
Type of Report:
|
Legal
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Local
Government Act 2002
|
|
Document ID:
|
872514
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Cameron Burton, Manager
Environmental Solutions
Kim Anstey, Planner
Policy/Analyst
|
1.1 Purpose
of Report
The purpose of this report is for
Council to adopt the Stormwater Bylaw 2020 having considered submissions at the
Council meeting on 19 November 2019, including the issues raised and amendments
requested during deliberations.
|
At the Meeting
The Director Infrastructure
Services and Manager Environmental Solutions spoke to the report and the four
main amendments to the Bylaw, made following the hearing.
In response to questions from
Councillors, the following points were clarified:
·
Officers will work with people, to a degree, to assist in
implementing environmental improvements at each site.
·
Even though the Bylaw will come into effect on 1 February 2020,
timeframes for each site to make changes will depend on the scale of the
operation, and contaminants etc. Council is ultimately looking for low cost
quick wins in this space and plans to be reasonable in enforcing the bylaw,
but not so reasonable that the same discussions are being had in 10
years’ time.
·
Environmental Management Plans will be required and implemented
as conditional consents.
·
If people want to be able to use the estuary, then Council need
to be seen to be leaders in this space and driving environmental change.
·
The Environmental Solutions team have a very busy work
programme. Council will be considering their own compliance requirements but
also need to look at other value-add opportunities for Napier. It would not
be prudent to delay the implementation of the Bylaw until Council itself is
perfectly compliant. Council will be pulling together a programme of work to
identify their own compliance requirements.
·
Significance of non-compliance will be at the discretion of
Council officers, as there may be other factors to consider, ie. quantity of
stormwater may not be as serious as discharge of industrial waste into
stormwater.
·
Council will take an educative approach initially and has
procedures in place to deal with nuisance reports made by members of the
public. Continued blatant abuse will be dealt with more strictly.
·
Any planting along waterways will need to be considered to
ensure that it doesn’t negate the main purpose of waterways, being
water conveyance.
Councillors
Simpson and Mawson left the meeting briefly at 11.10am and 11.11am
respectively, and returned at 11.13am.
·
Council’s piped network is required to meet a one in 10
year event. The rainfall in that time period may change, but we won’t
know that until it happens. Network models do however take into consideration
increased growth in the City.
ACTION: Council
officers to assess their own compliance requirements and consider these
against other priorities in the current work programme.
|
|
Council resolution
|
Dep. Mayor
Brosnan / Councillor Tapine
That Council:
a. Confirm,
in accordance with Section 155(2) of the Local Government Act 2002, that the
Stormwater Bylaw 2020 is the most appropriate form of bylaw and it is
satisfied that no issues arise under the Bill of Rights Act 1990.
b. Adopt
the Stormwater Bylaw 2020.
c. Authorise
officers to notify submitters and the public that the bylaw has been adopted
and will become operative on 1 February 2020.
|
2. Council
Meeting Schedule 2020
|
Type of Report:
|
Operational
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Local
Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987; Local Government Act
2002
|
|
Document ID:
|
872642
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Devorah
Nícuarta-Smith, Team Leader Governance
|
2.1 Purpose
of Report
To present the proposed 2020
meeting schedule to Council for adoption as per the Local Government Act 2002
and the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
|
At the Meeting
The Team Leader Governance
spoke to the report noting that an annual meeting schedule has been proposed
for a number of reasons, including that the Council is currently being hosted
by Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, an arrangement which is renegotiated
each year. A number of Councillors noted their approval of the new meeting
start time.
In response to questions from
Councillors, the following points were clarified:
·
The live stream is accessible directly via Council’s Facebook
page. A new YouTube channel is currently being created to store the videos
and a new link will replace the current link in order to access these via the
Council website.
·
Joint committee meetings are held in the internal Council
calendar.
·
Some flexibility (for example in week five of the meeting cycle)
could be given in order to accommodate meeting/seminar free weeks for those
Councillors wanting to take leave without needing to put in their apologies.
|
|
Council resolution
|
Councillors
Tapine / Wright
That Council:
a. Endorse
the schedule of Standing Committees and Council meetings for Napier City
Council for 2020
b. Note that
additional ordinary, extraordinary and multi-day meetings may be scheduled
from time to time in consultation with the Mayor and Chief Executive
c. Note that
meeting times for other committees and subcommittees will be formally
notified as required in accordance with the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the Local Government Act 2002.
d. Note
that other events requiring elected member attendance, such as citizenship
ceremonies and civic functions will be finalised as soon as possible and the
dates notified to Council.
|
3. Elected Members'
Childcare Allowance
|
Type of Report:
|
Operational
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Remuneration Determination
2019/20
|
|
Document ID:
|
872910
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Devorah
Nícuarta-Smith, Team Leader Governance
|
3.1 Purpose
of Report
To present options in relation to
a potential childcare allowance for elected members, in line with the
Remuneration Determination 2019/20.
|
At the Meeting
The Team Leader Governance
spoke to the report. In response to questions from Councillors, the following
points were clarified:
·
The officer’s recommendation of $2,000 per eligible child
per year was based on around 50 meetings/seminars per year at around $20 per
hour. The Remuneration Authority determined that Councils may adopt an amount
up to a maximum of $6,000.
·
The reimbursement is rates funded.
·
The reimbursement can only be claimed for costs incurred and
evidence must be provided.
·
The Remuneration Authority have taken WINZ provisions into
consideration. Au pairs and full time care are not covered. The reimbursement
is intended to cover ad hoc in home care.
A substitute motion was
proposed by Deputy Mayor Brosnan with the substantial change being an
increase to the maximum of $6,000 per eligible child. A robust debate
followed with all but two Councillors speaking to their position on the
matter, and when put to a vote, the motion was lost.
The officer’s
recommendation was then put, subject to a minor amendment, being that Council
authorised events be included. The amended motion was carried, with three
Councillors voting against the motion.
|
|
|
Officer’s Recommendation
That Council:
a. Adopts an
Elected Member Childcare Allowance Policy in line with the Remuneration
Determination 2019/20, and with the purpose of allowing for and guiding the
reimbursement elected members for childcare incurred by Council related
activities.
b. That
the Policy contains the following guidance in relation to potential payments:
i. The
allowance is only payable if:
· The
member is a parent or guardian of the child, or is a person who usually has
responsibility for the day-to-day care of the child (other than on a
temporary basis); and
· The
child is aged under 14 years of age; and
· The
childcare is provided by a person who –
§ is
not a family member of the elected member ; and
§ does
not ordinarily reside with the elected member; and
· The
member was participating in the following activities of Council during the
time the childcare was required:
§ Attendance
at Council or Committee meetings where the elected member is either a member
of the Committee, or is a Council appointee to the Committee; or
§ Attendance
at seminars or working parties of Council to discuss items of Council
business; or
§ Attendance
at civic events where attendance of elected members is required, such as
citizenship ceremonies and the annual Napier Civic Awards; and
· The
elected member submits a claim for expenses, and provides satisfactory
evidence to Napier City Council that the claim is based on actual costs
of child care incurred and paid for by the elected member; and
· Any
claim is filed within 90 days of the actual costs of child care being
incurred; and
· The
claim is authorised by the Mayor in line with the Napier City Council
Sensitive Expenditure Policy.
ii. The
maximum value for reimbursement is to be $20 per hour (plus GST where
applicable), and
iii. The
maximum accrued allowance per financial year per qualifying child is $2,000
(plus GST where applicable).
|
|
Proposed substitute motion
Motion lost
|
Dep. Mayor Brosnan / Councillor
Browne
That
Council:
a.
Council adopts the remuneration authority’s childcare
policy determination and wording:
b.
That the policy contain the following guidance and criteria:
i. Elected
members are eligible for the allowance only if:
· they are
engaged on local authority business at the time of the childcare,
· they are the parent
or guardian of the child, or usually has day-to-day responsibility for care
of the child, and
· the child is
under 14 years of age.
ii. The childcare
must be provided by someone who:
· is not a
family member of the elected member, and
· does not
ordinarily reside with the elected member.
iii. Elected
members must provide evidence of the amount paid for childcare.
iv.
Council must not pay childcare allowances to a member that total
more than $6,000 per annum, per child.
v.
All claims for childcare must be made within 90 days of the care
being incurred.
The motion was declared lost by 5
votes to 8 votes the voting being as follows:
For: Deputy
Mayor Brosnan, Councillors McGrath, Tapine, Mawson and Browne
Against: Mayor
Wise, Councillors Boag, Price, Taylor, Wright, Chrystal, Crown and Simpson
|
|
Council resolution
Amended officer’s
recommendation
New substitute motion
|
Mayor Wise
/ Councillor Mawson
That Council:
a. Adopts an
Elected Member Childcare Allowance Policy in line with the Remuneration
Determination 2019/20, and with the purpose of allowing for and guiding the
reimbursement elected members for childcare incurred by Council related
activities.
b. That
the Policy contains the following guidance in relation to potential payments:
i. The
allowance is only payable if:
· The
member is a parent or guardian of the child, or is a person who usually has
responsibility for the day-to-day care of the child (other than on a
temporary basis); and
· The
child is aged under 14 years of age; and
· The
childcare is provided by a person who –
§ is
not a family member of the elected member ; and
§ does
not ordinarily reside with the elected member; and
· The
member was participating in the following activities of Council during the
time the childcare was required:
§ Attendance
at Council or Committee meetings where the elected member is either a member
of the Committee, or is a Council appointee to the Committee; or
§ Attendance
at seminars or working parties of Council to discuss items of Council
business; or
§ Attendance
at civic events where attendance of elected members is required, such as Council
authorised events including citizenship ceremonies and the annual Napier
Civic Awards; and
· The
elected member submits a claim for expenses, and provides satisfactory
evidence to Napier City Council that the claim is based on actual costs
of child care incurred and paid for by the elected member; and
· Any
claim is filed within 90 days of the actual costs of child care being
incurred; and
· The
claim is authorised by the Mayor in line with the Napier City Council
Sensitive Expenditure Policy.
ii. The
maximum value for reimbursement is to be $20 per hour (plus GST where
applicable), and
iii. The
maximum accrued allowance per financial year per qualifying child is $2,000
(plus GST where applicable).
Councillors Tapine, Taylor, and Wright voted against
the motion.
|
The meeting adjourned at 12.22pm, and reconvened at
12.33pm.
Due to an external presenter only being available for a
short time, the Mayor elected to bring forward Agenda Item 8: Resident
Satisfaction Survey.
8. Resident
Satisfaction Survey 2019
|
Type of Report:
|
Operational
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Local
Government Act 2002
|
|
Document ID:
|
868500
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Adele Henderson, Director
Corporate Services
|
8.1 Purpose
of Report
To provide Council with the
annual resident satisfaction survey and to outline how this survey fits into
council’s planning and reporting framework.
|
At the Meeting
Dr Virgil Troy addressed
Council as the successful tenderer to undertake this research for Council on
a quarterly basis. He highlighted the differences in the new process from
what had previously been undertaken.
In response to questions from
Councillors, the following points were clarified:
·
There have been a number of iterations to this report; it would
be possible to break the result down further into wards to line up with the
ward only structure of Council. Dr Troy noted that it may be more appropriate
to include this data as an appendix.
·
The survey is ultimately around satisfaction levels for Council
services. The questions are very similar to the previous survey, just
reported back to Council differently.
It was noted that the
officer’s recommendation should be amended to note the increase of
satisfaction levels, overall.
|
|
Officer’s Recommendation
That Council:
a. Note
that satisfaction ratings and targets are part of Council’s planning
and performing framework as outlined in the Long Term Plan 2018-28.
b. Note
the key findings of the annual Resident Survey 2019.
i. That
there are areas where Council has received very high satisfaction ratings
from the community, particularly there has been an increase in overall
satisfaction ratings across all over Council’s services from 2018.
ii. That
there are some areas where Council has received low satisfaction ratings from
the community, and come under the NZ benchmark rating
c. Note that
it may wish to consider the Satisfaction Survey in the development of the
Annual Plan 2020/21.
|
|
Council resolution
Substitute motion
|
Councillors
Wright / Chrystal
That Council:
a. Note
that satisfaction ratings and targets are part of Council’s planning
and performing framework as outlined in the Long Term Plan 2018-28.
b. Note
the key findings of the annual Resident Survey 2019.
i. That
there are areas where Council has received very high satisfaction ratings
from the community, particularly there has been an increase in overall
satisfaction ratings across all over Council’s services from 2018.
ii. That
there are some areas where Council has received low satisfaction ratings from
the community, and come under the NZ benchmark rating
c.
Note that it may wish to consider the Satisfaction Survey in the development
of the Annual Plan 2020/21.
|
4. Mayoral
remuneration
|
Type of Report:
|
Operational
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Local
Government Act 2002; Remuneration Determination 2019/20
|
|
Document ID:
|
873231
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Devorah
Nícuarta-Smith, Team Leader Governance
|
4.1 Purpose
of Report
To note to Council the Mayoral
remuneration for the post-election period of 2019/20.
|
At the Meeting
The Team Leader Governance
spoke to the report, noting that the Mayor’s remuneration is set by the
Remuneration Authority allowing for slight adjustments in relation to a
vehicle, providing for different levels of private use.
In response to a question from
Councillors, it was confirmed that Council’s vehicle insurance policy
covers the full private use option elected by the Mayor.
|
|
Council resolution
|
Councillors
Taylor / Mawson
That Council:
a. Note
the total mayoral remuneration and vehicle arrangements for the post-election
period 2019/20.
|
5. Civic
Building Demolition
|
Type of Report:
|
Operational
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Local
Government Act 2002
|
|
Document ID:
|
871230
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Paulina Wilhelm, Manager City
Development
|
5.1 Purpose
of Report
To seek Council approval to
demolish the Civic building in 2020. Officers also propose investigating if
there are any cost savings in demolishing the Library building at the same time
and reporting the findings back to Council for considering the future plans for
the Civic Precinct Area (the area including the civic building, the library
building and the civic court, refer to attachment). It is noted that no
decision has been made on the future of the Library building at this time.
|
At the Meeting
The Director City Strategy and
Manager City Development spoke to the report and provided some context around
matters raised during the public forum by Mr Robinson. It was reiterated that
this report is not about the seismic evaluation of the building, but follows
on from the previous Council’s Statement of Proposal in line with the desire
to no longer retain the Civic Building site but rather divest it for
commercial purposes. Some further background was provided for the benefit of
the new Councillors.
Council officers confirmed
they are confident that potential hotel developers are not interested in the
Civic Building remaining on that site for their purposes. They also confirmed
that Council is currently in negotiations with hotel developers in relation
to the site; at this time it has not been confirmed whether the site will be
sold or leased.
It was noted that the building
remaining on that site is causing a “ghost town” effect on that
part of town and the site needs to be prepared for the next commercial
venture that will occupy the site, whatever that might be.
The meeting was adjourned at 12.58pm, in order to allow
the Audit and Risk Committee meeting to be opened on time and adjourned until
after the Council meeting had closed, and to allow for a brief lunch break.
The meeting reconvened at 1.31pm.
In response to questions from
Councillors, the following points were clarified:
·
Council officers did not believe there would be any harm in
deferring a decision at this stage; however, the longer the building remains
on the site, the more this contributes to the “ghost town” effect
to this part of the CBD.
·
There is not requirement to do anything with the Civic building
from a safety point of view currently.
·
The business case referred to the latest report, as a matter of
standard practice. It would be unusual to include every report over all time
on the same subject matter. The latest report is assumed to cover all issues
up to that moment in time, including issues raised previously.
·
Council officers were unaware that the Strata Group report might
be considered contentious. As far as the library building only being peer
reviewed, this was due to timing and what was able to be done overnight as
the matter was only raised with officers the day before. The focus was
particularly on the library building as officers were shocked at how low the
building had rated.
It was proposed that the item lay
on the table for the next Council meeting scheduled for 19 December 2019, to
allow Council officers to provide further background information to
Councillors ahead of making the decision.
ACTION: Costings around
refurbishment of the Civic Building to be provided to Councillors, ie. why
was refurbishment ruled out.
|
|
|
Officer’s Recommendation
That Council:
a. Approve going
to tender for the demolition of the Council Civic Administration building in
2020 and ring-fence the associated costs of demolition to be recovered from
the future use of the site either through the sale or a long term lease.
|
|
Council resolution
Substitute motion
|
Councillor
Wright / Mayor Wise
That Council:
a. Agree
that the Civic Building Demolition report should lie on the table to be
brought to the next ordinary meeting of Council, set down for 19 December
2019.
|
6. Budgets
to be Carried Forward to 2019/20
|
Type of Report:
|
Legal and
Operational
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Local
Government Act 2002
|
|
Document ID:
|
832927
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Caroline Thomson, Chief
Financial Officer
|
6.1 Purpose
of Report
To seek Council approval to carry
forward budgets into 2019/20.
|
At the Meeting
The Chief Financial Officer
spoke to the report and provided a brief overview. Councillors acknowledged
that Council has a large capital programme and asked officers to consider
whether this could be better aligned each year with what can actually be achieved.
|
|
Council resolution
|
Councillors
Taylor / Tapine
That Council:
a. Approve
total Capital carry forward budgeted expenditure of $15,485,128 split as
follows: $8,557,230 from 2018/19 into 2019/20 and $6,927,898 from 2018/19
into 2020/21.
b. Approve
total Operational Expenditure carry forward budgeted expenditure of $2,916,782
split as follows: $1,916,782 from 2018/19 into 2019/20 and $1,000,000 from
2018/19 into 2020/21.
|
7. Quarterly
Report for the three months ended 30 September 2019
|
Type of Report:
|
Legal and
Operational
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Enter Legal Reference
|
|
Document ID:
|
863933
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Caroline Thomson, Chief
Financial Officer
|
7.1 Purpose
of Report
To consider the Quarterly Report
for the nine months ended 30 September 2019.
|
At the Meeting
The Chief Financial Officer
spoke to the report, again providing a brief overview for Councillors. It was
noted that the carry forwards in the previous agenda item are not included in
the budgeted figures for this quarterly report, and these will improve
Council’s budgeted position once included.
The Mayor noted she was
pleased to see Napier above averatge for voter enrolments, particularly for youth,
and congratulated the Customer Services team for being ranked fifth out of 78
Councils for customer experience.
|
|
Council resolution
|
Councillors
Tapine / Mawson
That Council:
a. Receive
the Quarterly Report for the three months ended 30 September 2019.
|
9. NCC and Napier City
Business Inc Events
|
Type of Report:
|
Procedural
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
Local
Government Act 2002
|
|
Document ID:
|
874487
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Fleur Lincoln, Strategic
Planning Lead
|
9.1 Purpose
of Report
The purpose of this report is to
obtain a resolution of Council to allow trading in a public place to occur at
Napier City Council, Napier City Business Inc and Art Deco Trust events in
Napier city until the end of October 2022.
|
At the Meeting
The Strategic Planning Lead
spoke to the report, noting it is an extension of the resolution made in
February 2019, allowing trading at events held by Council, Napier City
Business Inc. or Art Deco Trust within the City centre.
It was suggested that Dickens
Street be included in the resolution; it was noted that this had only been omitted
due to there being no request for events held in this location to date.
A number of Councillors raised
concerns around waste disposal at these events and a discussion was held
around the challenges faced by event organisers in the waste minimisation
space.
In response to questions from
Councillors, the following points were clarified:
·
As the sound shell is reserve land, applications for events in
this area should be considered on a case by case basis.
·
It was noted that any specific events held under this
authorisation where there were problems could be reported back to Council.
ACTION: That
Council officers communicate Council’s expectations around waste
management with event organisers.
|
|
|
Officer’s Recommendation
That Council:
a. Resolve to
allow the sale of food and beverages to the public on public land within the
city centre as part of events held by either Napier City Council, Napier City
Business Inc or Art Deco Trust for a maximum of 18 events per year until 31st
October 2022 in accordance with the criteria below:
i. Trading
must occur as part of an event or pop-up event.
ii. Trading
must not occur for more than five hours at any one time, with the exception
of events held by the Art Deco Trust where trading is limited to the length
of the festival.
iii. Trading
must only occur within the street reserve (not on reserve land).
iv. Trading
of food and beverages only.
v. Permission
must be obtained from both the Transportation Team Leader and Napier City
Council Chief Executive.
vi. The
views of retailers will be taken into consideration prior to approving an
event.
vii. Trading
is limited to the following streets: Hastings Street; Market Street; Tennyson
Street; Emerson Street; Dalton Street; Clive Square East; Herschell Street;
Marine Parade.
viii. The
usual road closure procedures will be followed if road closures are deemed
necessary.
ix. Council
will operate within the Joint Alcohol Strategy and will use the Alcohol
Decision Matrix in considering whether it is appropriate to allow the sale of
alcohol at these events.
x. Trading
must comply with all regulations including the Food Act 2014 and the Sale and
Supply of Alcohol 2012, as well as Council regulations and policies.
|
|
Council resolution
Substitute Motion
|
Councillors
Wright / Chrystal
That Council:
a. Resolve to
allow the sale of food and beverages to the public on public land within the
city centre as part of events held by either Napier City Council, Napier City
Business Inc or Art Deco Trust for a maximum of 18 events per year until 31st
October 2022 in accordance with the criteria below:
i. Trading
must occur as part of an event or pop-up event.
ii. Trading
must not occur for more than five hours at any one time, with the exception
of events held by the Art Deco Trust where trading is limited to the length
of the festival.
iii. Trading
must only occur within the street reserve (not on reserve land).
iv. Trading
of food and beverages only.
v. Permission
must be obtained from both the Transportation Team Leader and Napier City
Council Chief Executive.
vi. The
views of retailers will be taken into consideration prior to approving an
event.
vii. Trading
is limited to the following streets: Hastings Street; Dickens Street; Market
Street; Tennyson Street; Emerson Street; Dalton Street; Clive Square East;
Herschell Street; Marine Parade.
viii. The
usual road closure procedures will be followed if road closures are deemed
necessary.
ix. Council
will operate within the Joint Alcohol Strategy and will use the Alcohol
Decision Matrix in considering whether it is appropriate to allow the sale of
alcohol at these events.
x. Trading
must comply with all regulations including the Food Act 2014 and the Sale and
Supply of Alcohol 2012, as well as Council regulations and policies.
Councillor Browne did not participate in the
discussion
or vote due to her declared conflict of interest.
|
10. Actions From
Previous Meetings
|
Type of Report:
|
Procedural
|
|
Legal Reference:
|
N/A
|
|
Document ID:
|
873456
|
|
Reporting Officer/s &
Unit:
|
Devorah
Nícuarta-Smith, Team Leader Governance
|
10.1 Purpose
of Report
To present the actions from
previous meetings for awareness.
|
At the Meeting
The Team Leader Governance
spoke to the report, confirming that action reports will come through to
Council meetings, and will include actions from standing committees. The
presentation and approach to the report was confirmed by the Council.
Councillor Taylor noted that
he would raise the constitution matter with Sport HB at his next meeting and
will keep officers updated.
|
|
Council resolution
|
Councillors
Tapine / Boag
That Council:
a. Note
the actions from previous meetings along with their current status.
|
Minor matters
not on the agenda
Waipatiki Project
Deputy Mayor Brosnan provided
an update to Councillors in relation to the Waipatiki Project, noting that she
and Councillor Price had met with the group working with Hastings District
Council, and had asked them to come and speak to Napier City Council at some
stage.
