Ordinary Meeting of Council
Open Agenda
Meeting Date: |
Tuesday 19 November 2024 |
Time: |
12:30 PM |
Venue: |
Small Exhibition Hall |
|
Livestreamed via Council’s Facebook page |
Council Members |
Chair: Mayor Wise Members: Deputy Mayor Brosnan, Councillors Boag, Browne, Chrystal, Crown, Greig, Mawson, McGrath, Price, Simpson, Tareha and Taylor |
Officer Responsible |
Chief Executive |
Administrator |
Governance Team |
|
Next Council Meeting Thursday 12 December 2024 |
Chairperson |
Her Worship Mayor Kirsten Wise |
Deputy Chairperson |
Deputy Mayor Annette Brosnan |
Membership |
All elected members |
Quorum |
7 |
Meeting frequency |
At least 6 weekly and as required |
Executive |
Chief Executive |
Purpose
The Council is responsible for:
1. Providing leadership to and advocacy on behalf of the people of Napier.
2. Ensuring that all functions and powers required of a local authority under legislation, and all decisions required by legislation to be made by local authority resolution, are carried out effectively and efficiently, either by the Council or through delegation.
Terms of Reference
The Council is responsible for the following powers which cannot be delegated to committees, subcommittees, officers or any other subordinate decision-making body[1]:
1. The power to make a rate
2. The power to make a bylaw
3. The power to borrow money, or purchase or dispose of assets, other than in accordance with the long-term plan
4. The power to adopt a long-term plan, annual plan, or annual report
5. The power to appoint a chief executive
6. The power to adopt policies required to be adopted and consulted on under the Local Government Act 2002 in association with the long-term plan or developed for the purpose of the local governance statement, including the 30-Year Infrastructure Strategy
7. The power to adopt a remuneration and employment policy.
8. The power to establish a joint committee with another local authority or other public body[2].
9. The power to approve or change the District Plan, or any part of that Plan, in accordance with the Resource Management Act 1991.
10. The power to make the final decision on a recommendation from the Parliamentary Ombudsman, where it is proposed that Council not accept the recommendation.
11. The power to make a final decision whether to adopt, amend, revoke, or replace a local Easter Sunday shop trading policy, or to continue a local Easter Sunday shop trading policy without amendment following a review.[3]
Delegated Power to Act
The Council retains all decision making authority, and will consider recommendations of its committees prior to resolving a position.
Specific matters that will be considered directly by Council include without limitation unless by statute:
1. Direction and guidance in relation to all stages of the preparation of Long Term Plans and Annual Plans
2. Approval or amendment of the Council’s Standing Orders[4].
3. Approval or amendment the Code of Conduct for Elected Members[5].
4. Appointment and discharging of committees, subcommittees, and any other subordinate decision-making bodies[6].
5. Approval of any changes to the nature and delegations of any Committees.
6. Appointment and discharging of members of committees (as required and in line with legislation in relation to the role and powers of the Mayor) [7].
7. Approval of governance level strategies, plans and policies which advance council’s vision and strategic goals.
8. Resolutions required to be made by a local authority under the Local Electoral Act 2001, including the appointment of an electoral officer.
9. Reviewing of representation arrangements, at least six yearly[8].
10. Approval of any changes to city boundaries under the Resource Management Act.
11. Appointment or removal of trustees, directors or office holders to Council’s Council-Controlled Organisations (CCOs) and Council Organisations (COs) and to other external bodies.
12. Approval the Local Governance Statement as required under the Local Government Act 2002.
13. Approval of the Triennial Agreement as required under the Local Government Act 2002.
14. Allocation of the remuneration pool set by the Remuneration Authority for the remuneration of elected members.
15. To consider and decide tenders for the supply of goods and services, where tenders exceed the Chief Executive’s delegated authority, or where projects are formally identified by Council to be of particular interest. In addition, in the case of the latter, milestone reporting to Council will commence prior to the procurement process.
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 19 November 2024 - Open Agenda
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Karakia
Apologies
Councillor Boag
Conflicts of interest
Public forum
Announcements by the Mayor including notification of minor matters not on the agenda
Note: re minor matters only - refer LGOIMA s46A(7A) and Standing Orders s9.13
A meeting may discuss an item that is not on the agenda only if it is a minor matter relating to the general business of the meeting and the Chairperson explains at the beginning of the public part of the meeting that the item will be discussed. However, the meeting may not make a resolution, decision or recommendation about the item, except to refer it to a subsequent meeting for further discussion.
Announcements by the management
Confirmation of minutes
That the Draft Minutes of the Ordinary Meetings of Council held on Thursday 31 October and Thursday, 7 November 2024 be confirmed as a true and accurate record of the meeting......................... 50
Information items
Agenda items
1 Adoption of Draft Future Development Strategy.............................................................. 5
Minor matters not on the agenda – discussion (if any)
Recommendation to Exclude the Public................................................................. 49
Agenda Items
1. Adoption of Draft Future Development Strategy
Type of Report: |
Operational and Procedural |
Legal Reference: |
Local Government Act 2002 |
Document ID: |
1808867 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Fleur Lincoln, Principal Policy Planner |
1.1 Purpose of Report This Report recommends Council adopt the draft Napier Hastings Future Development Strategy (FDS) for public notification and public consultation under the Special Consultative Procedure (SCP) in Section 83 of the Local Government Act 2002.
|
That Council:
a. Receive the report titled Adoption of the Draft Napier/Hastings Future Development Strategy for Public Notification and Consultation dated 19 November 2024.
b. Receive the Napier Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee (Committee) Resolutions from its Committee Meeting on 23 October 2024.
· That the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee receive the report titled Adoption of Draft Future Development Strategy for Notification dated 22 July 2024.
· That the Joint Committee adopt the following Objective, to be added to its ‘Strategic Objectives’ for the FDS, which the Joint Committee adopted at its meeting on 11 July 2023,
“The values and aspirations of mana whenua for development are a priority and are recognised and supported”.
· That the Joint Committee adopt the draft ‘Napier / Hastings Future Development Strategy’ (FDS) attached as Attachment One and ‘Summary of Information’ attached as Attachment Two with the following variations,
i. That the Ahuriri Station land is identified for inclusion as redress land as detailed in Attachment 5.
ii. Hn3a- Middle Road (excluded).
iii. Hn3b- Middle Road extension (excluded).
On the basis for ii & iii that:
· These areas are not needed to provide sufficient development capacity to meet demand (including the 20% competitiveness margin),
· Hn3a and Hn3b are areas of land are Highly Productive (including ‘Land Use Capability’ level 1 and 2 land),
· These areas are not included in Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy (except as a reserve area in the case of Hn3a),
· It would be contrary to the objectives of the FDS to include these areas.
‘That the Joint Committee recommend to the Partner Councils (Hastings District Council, Napier City Council and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council) that they adopt the FDS and ‘Summary of Information’ (including the Variations in Recommendation B) for consultation under the Special Consultative Procedure as specified in Section 83 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), and call for submissions in accordance with the Principles of Consultation under Section 82 of the LGA, and provide an opportunity for the hearing of submissions, under section 83 of the LGA’.
c. Adopt (after consideration of Recommendation B) the draft ‘Napier / Hastings Future Development Strategy’ (FDS) attached as Attachment One (which includes the Joint Committee’s recommendations with the exception of ii and iii to exclude Middle Road, HN3a and HN3b) and the ‘Summary of Information’ attached as Attachment Two.
d. Confirm, or otherwise, the Joint Committee’s Recommendations ii and iii to exclude Middle Road, HN3a and HN3b from the consultation draft.
e. Notify the FDS and ‘Summary of Information’ for consultation under the Special Consultative Procedure as specified in Section 83 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), and call for submissions in accordance with the Principles of Consultation under Section 82 of the LGA, and provide an opportunity for the hearing of submissions, under section 83 of the LGA.
f. Approve an amendment to Section 6 (relates to Delegated Authority) of the Terms of Reference for the Napier Hastings Future Strategy Joint Committee (Committee) to allow the Committee to appoint an independent panel of up to five members that is representative of Mātauranga Māori, gender balance, equity, and technical knowledge of the legislation that encompasses the Future Development Strategy.
The amendment to Section 6 of the Terms of Reference will read as follows:
6.1 The Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee has the responsibility delegated by the Partner Councils for:
Appointing an Independent Panel of
up to five members that is representative of Mātauranga Māori, gender
balance, equity, and technical knowledge of the legislation that encompasses
the Future Development Strategy which will undertake Hearing and
considering submissions on the draft strategy and making appropriate
recommendations to the Joint Committee partner
councils, which will subsequently
make appropriate recommendations to the Partner Councils.
g. Note the Independent Panel will act in accordance with the ‘Principles of Consultation’ under Section 82 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), in the hearing of submissions, under the Special Consultative Procedure under section 83 of the LGA to assist the Committee by hearing all persons / parties who wish to submit on the FDS. The Independent Panel will prepare a summation of all submissions and provide recommendations to the Joint Committee, for consideration by the Committee. The Committee can then recommend a final FDS to the Partner Councils.
The draft FDS has been developed by Barker & Associates, which is a specialist planning consultancy. The draft FDS development has been a partnership with Hastings District Council, Napier City Council, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (Partner Councils), Maungaharuru Tangitū Trust, Mana Ahuriri Trust and Tamatea Pōkai Whenua, with input from officers, consultants and interested individuals, groups and stakeholders.
The draft FDS satisfies the statutory requirements for Future Development Strategies under the National Policy Statement for Urban Development 2020 (NPS-UD). The NPS-UD states that the purpose of an FDS is to promote long term strategic planning by setting out how the Partner Councils intend to:
· Achieve well-functioning urban environments in existing and future urban areas,
· Provide at least sufficient development capacity over the next 30 years to meet expected demand, and
· Assist with the integration of planning decisions under the Resource Management Act with infrastructure planning and funding decisions.
The final FDS will replace the current Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy 2017 (HPUDS) once adopted by the Partner Councils following public consultation using the SCP. The draft FDS was considered by the Napier Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee (Committee) at its meeting on 23rd October 2024. The Committee resolved;
· That the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee receive the report titled Adoption of Draft Future Development Strategy for Notification dated 22 July 2024. · That the Joint Committee adopt the following Objective, to be added to its ‘Strategic Objectives’ for the FDS, which the Joint Committee adopted at its meeting on 11 July 2023, “The values and aspirations of mana whenua for development are a priority and are recognised and supported”. · That the Joint Committee adopt the draft ‘Napier / Hastings Future Development Strategy’ (FDS) attached as Attachment One and ‘Summary of Information’ attached as Attachment Two with the following variations, i. That the Ahuriri Station land is identified for inclusion as redress land as detailed in Attachment 5. ii. Hn3a- Middle Road (excluded). iii. Hn3b- Middle Road extension (excluded). On the basis for ii & iii that: · These areas are not needed to provide sufficient development capacity to meet demand (including the 20% competitiveness margin), · Hn3a and Hn3b are areas of land are Highly Productive (including ‘Land Use Capability’ level 1 and 2 land), · These areas are not included in Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy (except as a reserve area in the case of Hn3a), · It would be contrary to the objectives of the FDS to include these areas.
|
The draft FDS is attached as Attachment One. A similar Report is being presented to each of the Partner Councils, as each Council must adopt the draft FDS for notification and consultation.
The consultation period can commence after the Partner Councils have adopted the draft FDS for notification and consultation. The consultation period must be for a minimum 1 month. Officers recommend a consultation period ‘November 23rd to December 23rd 2024’. The SCP requires Council to prepare and adopt a ‘Statement of Proposal’, (SOP) and if Council considers on reasonable grounds that it is necessary to enable public understanding of the SOP a summary of the information contained in the SOP. The draft FDS serves as the SOP. A ‘Summary of Information’ has been prepared and is attached as Attachment Two.
The Terms of Reference for the Committee, adopted by the Partner Councils, delegate the Committee to hear and consider submissions on the draft FDS and make appropriate recommendations to the Partner Councils. The Committee resolved;
This Report recommends the Partner Councils amend the Committee Terms of Reference, to allow the Committee to appoint an independent panel of up to five members that is representative of Mātauranga Māori, gender balance, equity, and technical knowledge of the legislation that encompasses the Future Development Strategy. The Independent Panel will act in accordance with the ‘Principles of Consultation’ under Section 82 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), in the hearing of submissions, under the Special Consultative Procedure under section 83 of the LGA to assist the Committee by hearing all persons / parties who wish to submit on the FDS. The Independent Panel will prepare a summation of all submissions and provide recommendations to the Committee, for consideration by the Committee. The Committee can then recommend a final FDS to the Partner Councils.
1.3 Issues
Ahuriri Station
Mana Ahuriri Trust proposed through the “Call for Opportunities Process” that the Ahuriri Station area be included within the FDS. The Ahuriri Station area encompasses the existing Pāmu land, adjacent to Hawke’s Bay Airport and adjacent to Onehunga Road. Ahuriri Station is available to Mana Ahuriri Trust to purchase as part of the Treaty Settlement reached and entered between Ahuriri Hapū and the Crown. The ability to purchase Ahuriri Station is intended to provide Ahuriri Hapū with economic redress. Mana Ahuriri Trust has advised that they intend to purchase and redevelop the site into an ecologically sensitive freight, logistics and industrial hub, and for a range of other activities (including residential). The development has recently been included as a project in Schedule 2 of the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The project is described as follows:
“The project will develop an integrated resilient Green Communities commercial and industrial business park (circa 380 hectares), 1,000 plus houses as an extension to Bayview, the creation of ecological parks, and the preservation and enhancement of key cultural landmarks and features, connected to the regional airport, port and state highway and rail corridor.”
The Fast Track Approvals Bill is intended to pass into law by the end of 2024. The final form of this legislation has not been confirmed although it has been signalled that resource consent application(s) will be considered by an independent hearings panel.
Following further discussions with Mana Ahuriri Trust, it was recommended to the Joint Committee by officers that the draft FDS identifies Ahuriri Station as Redress Land, which reflects its status under the Trust’s Treaty Settlement. Supporting text is included in the draft FDS to explain what this means. The text has been developed collaboratively with Mana Ahuriri Trust and officers recommend it is included in the Draft FDS.
The Joint Committee voted unanimously to include the Ahuriri Station redress land in the Draft FDS.
Committee Resolutions
The draft ‘Committee Meeting Minutes’ from their Meeting on 23 October 2024 are attached as Attachment 3, and are summarised below:
· Remove Middle Road sites HN3a and HN3b from the draft strategy for the reasons being:
ii. These areas of land are Highly Productive (including ‘Land Use Capability’ level 1 and 2 land),
iii. These areas are not included in Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy (except as a reserve area in the case of Hn3a),
iv. It would be contrary to the objectives of the FDS to include these areas.
The sites in question are shown in the image below:
This motion was passed with 4 votes in favour, 3 against, and the remainder as abstentions to remove the two sites from the draft FDS.
· Remove Riverbend Road site NC4b from the draft strategy for the reason being:
i. This area is not needed to provide sufficient development capacity to meet demand (including the 20% competitiveness margin),
ii. The land is subject to severe flooding risk,
iii. This area is not included in Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy
iv. It would be contrary to the objectives of the FDS to include this area.
The site in question is shown in the image below (NC4b only):
The vote on this motion was 3 for; 3 against and the remainder as abstentions. This equal split vote means the motion was not passed by the Joint Committee.
Implications for Residential Capacity
The table below show the changes to development capacity that results from including Ahuriri Station and removing the Middle Road sites. It also shows the capacity of the Riverbend Road site which was discussed.
The first table shows the changes to greenfield development capacity and the second table shows the changes to overall development capacity, including intensification.
Site Ref |
Site Name / Location |
Approx. Capacity |
NC4a |
Riverbend Road / Willowbank Avenue, Napier |
290 dwellings |
NC4b |
Riverbend Road, Napier |
660 dwellings |
NC4d |
South Pirimai, Ulyatt Road, Napier |
370 dwellings |
NC6 |
Mission Estate, Church Road, Napier |
100 dwellings |
H2a |
Lyndhurst Extension, Hastings |
280 dwellings |
H3 |
Kaiapo Road, Hastings |
430 dwellings |
H4 |
Murdoch Road, Hastings |
120 dwellings |
H8 |
Copeland Road, Hastings |
130 dwellings |
FM2 |
Portsmouth Road, Flaxmere |
330 dwellings |
HN2b |
Arataki Road Extension, Havelock North |
110 dwellings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HN6 |
Brookvale Road, Havelock North |
125 dwellings |
HN10 |
Oderings Site, Havelock North |
35 dwellings |
AS |
Ahuriri Station, Bayview |
1,000 dwellings |
Total |
|
The changes would result in a modest overall increase in development capacity. There would be a modest shortfall of development capacity in Hastings, however, this would be made up through additional development capacity in Napier. Removing the Middle Road sites from the Draft FDS would result in a drop in greenfield capacity for Havelock North, from 910 dwellings to 270 dwellings.
The loss in development capacity arising from removal of sites would be made up by the additional residential capacity enabled in Ahuriri Station, Bayview. There are infrastructure implications associated with these changes as detailed in the Technical Report, with development at Ahuriri Station requiring more significant upgrades than other locations. When accounting for the projected long-term split of greenfield/intensification (50% each), there is sufficient greenfield capacity to meet demand.
While the development capacity broadly ‘balances out’ it is important to bear in mind that there is uncertainty about how, when and if development capacity will be realised. There is uncertainty over the readiness of enabling infrastructure and the extent to which development opportunities can be realised, such as land banking. This can hinder market supply responding to demand. Rather than viewing capacity as a target to meet, it is helpful to recognise that more capacity means more development opportunities and greater market competition.
The NPSUD requires the FDS to provide “at least” sufficient development capacity to meet demand (Policy 2). It also requires a variety of homes to be provided that meet people’s needs, in terms of type, price and location (Policy 1). The NPSUD therefore encourages the FDS to provide greater capacity than is strictly necessary to cater for future uncertainty and to support market competition. This approach would ensure that the FDS provides genuine options and has continued strategic relevance to the Councils and development community should demand be greater, or development capacity not be delivered as we expect it to.
Independent Hearings Panel
The Committee resolved to recommend to the Partner Councils to appoint an Independent Panel to assist the Joint Committee by hearing all parties/persons who wish to submit on the FDS. The Independent Panel will prepare a summation of all submissions and provide recommendations to the Joint Committee for consideration. The Joint Committee would then recommend a final FDS to the Partner Councils.
The Committee resolved to recommend to the Partner Councils to appoint an independent panel of up to five members that is representative of Mātauranga Māori, gender balance, equity, and technical knowledge of the legislation that encompasses the Future Development Strategy. This recommendation would require an amendment to the Committee Terms of Reference, 6.1 Point 5 Delegated Authority which provides for the Committee to hear and consider submissions and provide recommendations to the Partner Councils.
The Committee voted unanimously for submissions to be heard by an Independent Panel.
1.4 Significance and Engagement
Special Consultative Procedure
Clause 3.15 of the NPSUD, requires the Special Consultative Procedure (under section 83 of LGA) is used when preparing or updating an FDS. This process requires public notification and provision for making submissions. The standard requirements and expectations of the LGA, including Consultation Principles under Section 82 apply to the FDS process. This includes the requirement to adopt a process that is procedurally fair and in accord with principals of ‘natural justice’ - namely people have a right to be heard and have their views/submissions considered impartially with an ‘open mind’.
The Council must prepare and adopt a description of the proposed decision or course of action. This is referred to as the ‘Statement of Proposal’. If Council considers it necessary to enable public understanding, the Council must also prepare and adopt a ‘Summary of Information’ contained in the ‘Statement of Proposal.
Council must make the ‘Statement of Proposal’ and ‘Summary of Information’ as widely available to the public as is reasonably practicable. Council must also make available a description of how and when interested persons can present their views on the proposal. The submission period must be at least one month from the date the Statement of Proposal is issued. The draft FDS is the ‘Statement of Proposal’ the Partner Council’s will be consulting on. The draft FDS and ‘Summary of Information’ are attached (as Attachments one and two).
Consultation undertaken to date
Development of the draft FDS has included engagement with mana whenua, elected officials, the community, interested landowners and developers, to inform detailed technical analysis and evaluation.
The key engagement phases have been:
· Community Engagement on the ‘Issues and Options Report’ which included the following:
‘Call for Opportunities’ inviting developers, consultants and interested parties to nominate sites for consideration.
A two-week physical ‘Shop Front’ for the community to call in and engage with staff.
Public interactive sessions.
Specific meetings with those who nominated opportunities for development.
A public questionnaire requesting feedback on the key themes and the preferred options, resulting in approximately 60 responses.
· Ongoing engagement with Mana Whenua, liaising with PSGE (Post Settlement Governance Entities) Groups Tamatea Pōkai Whenua, Mana Ahuriri Trust and Mangaharuru Tangitū Trust, and discussions with Hāpu and organisations.
· Engagement with infrastructure providers and Government organisations to test the spatial scenarios and supporting analysis. This group included the New Zealand Transport Agency, the Ministry of Education, Kāinga Ora, Transpower, Unison, Hawke’s Bay Airport, Port of Napier, and Ministry for the Environment.
Consultation Plan
Subject to the Partner Councils resolving the Recommendations.
· Draft FDS and supporting documents on FDS website
· Notification of draft FDS under Special Consultative Procedure
· One calendar month submission period from 23rd November to 23 December 24.
Direct notification to key stakeholder list
Newspaper/Facebook/Website advertising
Officer Meetings on request
· Hearings Mid-March 2025 (dates To Be Confirmed)
· June 2025 -Committee’s consideration of recommendations from Hearings Panel
· July 2025 - Final approval of FDS by Partner Councils.
1.5 Implications
Financial
As noted below under ‘Risk’, Council will need to work closely alongside developers to understand the timing for release and development phasing of these greenfields sites in order to best pivot to the required programme of works required to support such developments. This may result in a reprioritisation of Council’s programme.
Social & Policy
The Napier Hastings Future Development Strategy is a strategic tool to assist with the integration of planning decisions under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) with infrastructure and funding decisions. It shows:
· Where growth will be in Napier and Hastings, in existing and new urban areas over the next 30 years;
· The infrastructure needed to support and service that growth; and
· Development constraints.
The FDS has been developed in partnership with Hastings District Council, Napier City Council, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, Maungaharuru Tangitū Trust, Mana Ahuriri Trust and Tamatea Pōkai Whenua.
The FDS satisfies the statutory requirements for future development strategies under the NPS-UD. The NPS-UD states that the purpose of an FDS is to promote long term strategic planning by setting out how the Partner Councils intend to:
· Achieve well-functioning urban environments in existing and future urban areas;
· Provide at least sufficient development capacity over the next 30 years to meet expected demand; and
· Assist with the integration of planning decisions under the RMA with infrastructure planning and funding decisions.
Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy (HPUDS)
HPUDS was initially developed in 2010 and adopted by the Partner Councils to manage urban growth on the Heretaunga Plains over a 30-year timeframe (2015–2045). Subsequent updates and amendments to HPUDS were made in 2017. The FDS builds on and replaces HPUDS. The FDS responds to the new requirements of the NPS-UD and other legislative direction, including the National Policy Statement for Highly Productive Land 2022 (NPS-HPL).
In preparing the FDS, all unzoned future growth areas identified within HPUDS have been reconsidered to determine their appropriateness to accommodate future development. The FDS proposes amendments to the land identified for growth over the next 30 years. The amendments include additional areas considered for development and removal of some existing growth areas from HPUDS.
Napier Spatial Picture
Napier notified a Spatial Picture for public consultation in August 2021 together with the release of the Draft District Plan.
The Napier Spatial Picture was the first step in having a plan for Napier’s growth. The spatial picture looked at the options for ‘where’ Napier could provide more housing and business land. Following the adoption of the spatial picture Council engaged Barkers and Associates to do a Napier City High Level Structure Plan and GHD to do a Napier Servicing Structure Plan (3 Waters). These documents assessed the viability, suitability, infrastructure requirements and costs associated with the growth options in the Napier Spatial Picture.
The outcomes of this strategy were key considerations in the FDS process and the Proposed District Plan.
FDS alignment with other strategies
The following chart summarises the various key statutes, plus policy and planning instruments which influence the FDS.
Risk
It is difficult to avoid development constraints in Napier on any site – whether they be natural hazards, infrastructure provision, or geotechnical challenges. Napier’s primary focus on intensification seeks to address these concerns by providing the most efficient means of development within the existing urban area. Greenfield development areas, as identified in the draft FDS provide for market needs, and have been considered against a range of criteria to determine the best locations for development. The inclusion of Ahuriri Station as Redress Land, provides for the development aspirations of Mana Ahuriri Trust.
Before development of this site, and all other greenfield sites can occur, a resource consent and/or plan change process will need to demonstrate, in sufficient detail, how matters such as natural hazard risk, sea level rise, and infrastructure provision, will be addressed and provided for. Council will need to work closely alongside developers to understand the timing for release and development phasing of these greenfields sites in order to best pivot to the required programme of works required to support such developments. This may result in a reprioritisation of Council’s programme.
1.6 Options
The options available to Council are as follows:
Option One
1.7.1 Public Notification of the Draft Future Development Strategy
Advantages
· Meets the obligations of the Partner Councils under the National Policy Statement – Urban Development 2020 to produce a Future Development Strategy
· It is a collaborative document between mana whenua and the Partner Councils
· It has been drafted with considerable input from the community, mana whenua partners and key stakeholders.
· It will provide increased certainty for the future planned growth of the Napier/Hastings urban environment and assist to identify other opportunities for future growth in the longer-term.
Disadvantages
· No disadvantages are noted.
Option Two
1.7.2 Do not Notify the Draft Future Development Strategy
Advantages
· No advantages are noted.
Disadvantages
· The Partner Council’s will fail to meet their obligations under the National Policy Statement – Urban Development 2020 to produce a Future Development Strategy
· It will result in uncertainty for the future planned growth of the Napier/Hastings urban environment.
· There is considerable community expectation around the delivery of the Draft FDS and a formal Special Consultation Process to provide opportunity for public comment.
Option Three
1.7.2.1 Notification of an amended draft Future Development Strategy
Advantages
· No advantages are noted
Disadvantages
· The draft FDS provides a basis for public discussion. Rather than try and predetermine the final FDS, it is preferable to let the SCP process follow its course.
1.7 Development of Preferred Option
As noted above, Option One, the notification of the draft FDS as appended in Attachment One will have several advantages including meeting the obligations of the Partner Councils under the National Policy Statement – Urban Development 2020 to produce a Future Development Strategy. All three partner Councils will be considering the same recommendations, and all three must make resolutions as recommended, for the Future Development Strategy to progress to notification.
The inclusion of Ahuriri Station as Redress Land provides considerable capacity in both residential and business development, should matters such as the sites susceptibility to natural hazards and other constraints be resolved.
The draft Future Development Strategy aligns with the approach taken in the Napier Spatial Picture and Proposed Napier District Plan, with the exception of the inclusion of Ahuriri Station, for a focus on intensification of existing urban areas.
1 Draft FDS - Full - DOC ID 1809977 (Under separate cover 1)
2 Summary of Information - DOC ID 1809976
3 Draft FDS Minutes - 220724 - 231024 - DOC ID 1809974
4 Draft FDS Minutes Attachment 220724 - 231024 - DOC ID 1809975
Recommendation to Exclude the Public
That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:
Agenda Items
1. Notification of the PDP Ecosystems and Indigenous Biodiversity Variation
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public was excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution were as follows:
General subject of each matter to be considered. |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter. |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) to the passing of this resolution. |
Plain English reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Agenda Items |
|||
1. Notification of the PDP Ecosystems and Indigenous Biodiversity Variation |
7(2)(j) Prevent the disclosure or use of official information for improper gain or improper advantage |
48(1)(a) That the public
conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting
would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good
reason for withholding would exist: |
Prevent the disclosure or use of officvial information for improper gain or improper advantage |
Public Excluded Text |
|||
Council has considered the public interest in the information above and balanced those interests with the reason(s) for withholding this information. This ensures Council has met the requirements for withholding information under section 7(2) of the Local Government and Official Information and Meetings Act 1987. |
Ordinary Meeting of Council
Open Minutes
Meeting Date: |
Thursday 31 October 2024 |
Time: |
9.30am - 12:33am (Adopt Annual Report) |
Venue |
Chapman Room |
|
Livestreamed via Council’s Facebook page |
Present |
Chair: Mayor Wise Members: Deputy Mayor Brosnan, Councillors Boag, Browne, Chrystal, Crown, Greig, Mawson, McGrath, Price, and Tareha |
In Attendance |
Chief Executive (Louise Miller) Acting Executive Director Corporate Services (Caroline Thomson) Acting Executive Director City Services (Jessica Ellerm) Executive Director City Strategy (Rachael Bailey) Executive Director Infrastructure Services (Russell Bond) Executive Director Community Services (Thunes Cloete) Manager Communications and Marketing (Julia Stevens) Team Leader Governance (Anna Eady) Financial Controller (Talia Foster) Economic Development Manager (Bill Roberts) Manager Community Strategies (Anne Bradbury) Manager Strategy and Transformation (Stephanie Murphy) Senior Policy Analyst (Michele Grigg) Policy Analyst (Jeriel Sajan) Manager Arts, Culture and Heritage (Elizabeth Caldwell) Libraries Manager (Nicola Saunders) Acting Manager Environmental Solutions (Sarah Bowler) Waste Minimisation Lead (Stefni Wilson) Team Leader Open Spaces (Tania Diack) Manager City Development (Paulina Wilhelm) [online] |
Also in Attendance |
Chief Executive Officer, Hawke’s Bay Regional Economic Development Agency (Lucy Laitinen) Director, Hawke’s Bay Regional Economic Development Agency (Karen Rangi) Waste Planning Manager, Hastings District Council (Angela Atkins) Principal Waste and Resource Recovery Consultant , Tonkin and Taylor, (Kimberley Hope) [online] |
Administration |
Governance Advisor (Jemma McDade) |
Ordinary Meeting of Council – Open Minutes
Table of Contents
Order of Business Page No.
Resolution to Exclude the Public
2. Regional Economic Development Agency Update
Announcements by the management
1. Adoption of Annual Report 2023/24
4. Draft City Wide Reserve Management Plan
5. 2025 Napier City Council Meeting Schedule
6. Information - Minutes of Joint Committees
7. Action Points Register as at 14 October 2024.
12. Joint Waste Assessment and Waste Management and Minimisation Plan (WMMP)
9. Review of Gambling Venues Policy
10. Napier Library Content & Collections Policy
11. Draft Freedom Camping Bylaw 2024
Order of Business
The meeting opened with the Council Karakia
Council resolution |
That the apologies from Councillors Simpson and Taylor be accepted. |
Nil
Resolution to Exclude the Public
Council resolution |
That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting. |
Agenda Items
1. Chief Executive Performance and Remuneration Review (LIMITED DISTRIBUTION)
2. Action Points Register (Public Excluded) as at 14 October 2024
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public was excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution were as follows:
General subject of each matter to be considered. |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter. That the public conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information where the withholding of the information is necessary to: |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) to the passing of this resolution. 48(1)(a) That the public conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist: |
Plain English reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Agenda Items |
|||
1. Chief Executive Performance and Remuneration Review (LIMITED DISTRIBUTION) |
7(2)(a) Protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person |
48(1)(a) That the public
conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting
would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good
reason for withholding would exist: |
Sensitive information on performance and remuneration of Chief Executive |
2. Action Points Register (Public Excluded) as at 14 October 2024 |
7(2)(a) Protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person 7(2)(c)(i) Protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information would be likely to prejudice the supply of similar information or information from the same source and it is in the public interest that such information should continue to be supplied 7(2)(h) Enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities 7(2)(i) Enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) |
48(1)(a) That the public
conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting
would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good
reason for withholding would exist: |
To protect privacy, conduct negotiations and protect the source of information. |
Public Excluded Text |
|||
Council has considered the public interest in the information above and balanced those interests with the reason(s) for withholding this information. This ensures Council has met the requirements for withholding information under section 7(2) of the Local Government and Official Information and Meetings Act 1987. |
The meeting moved into the Open Agenda at 9:48am
Chief Executive Officer, Hawke’s Bay Regional Economic Development Agency (Lucy Laitinen) and Director, Hawke’s Bay Regional Economic Development Agency (Karen Rangi) presented their report.
Karen provided the reminder that the Regional Economic Development Agency (REDA) was formed at the end of 2021. The letter of expectations is brought to Council for approval today.
Lucy provided the update that REDA has undertaken research to understand the shape of the local economy and how local government can help create business success. Data has been collected for the past five years. About 70 interviews have been conducted with local businesses, ranging from about 45 minutes to 2 hours in length, exploring barriers and opportunites. A high level of engagement has been achieved with an upcoming workshop to explore further. Although the rebound from Cyclone Gabrielle has been better than expected, some industries are still struggling. A finding that stood out was the level of investment in technology by primary industry. Businesses are attracted to Hawke’s Bay due to the natural resources, climate, land, port, and airport, although the principal reason is links to family and community. This principal reason is more specific to Hawke’s Bay and differs from other regions.
The challenges include the risk of manufacturing moving off-shore, infrastructure availabilty, the cost of utilities and appropriate staffing.
Testing is being done regarding the reslience of State Highway 2 and it’s role in opening up the Wairoa economy. Tehei Takitimu has been engaged to promote equity in health outcomes and to link good economic outcomes to good health outcomes. There is an opportunity to develop further structure.
Item two on the agenda was taken out of order to accommodate the Hawke’s Bay REDA staff to be present.
2. Regional Economic Development Agency Update
Type of Report: |
Information |
|
Legal Reference: |
N/A |
|
Document ID: |
1801798 |
|
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Bill Roberts, Economic Development Manager |
|
2.1 Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is for the Chief Executive (Lucy Laitinen) and Chair (Alasdair MacLeod) of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Economic Development Agency to provide an update on activities since the last presentation. |
|
|
At the meeting Chief Executive, Hawke’s Bay REDA (Lucy Laitinen) and Director, Hawke’s Bay REDA (Karen Rangi) joined the officer to present the report. Questions were answered clarifying: · This has been a thorough process; the next steps involve delineation of tasks and responsibilities between Napier City Council (NCC) and Hawkes Bay Regional Council (HBRC). · The Matariki kaupapa is still the vision for REDA. · REDA are using modelling to contribute to the NZTA business case advocating the economic benefit of upgrading State Highway 2 to Central Government. The quantum of the barrier would need to be emphasised due to the low contribution of Wairoa to the overall GDP. The business case would be strengthened by surveying businesses in Gisborne and Wairoa to assess opportunities. · The meeting spaces at the Business Hub in Hastings are advertised through the website, signage and word of mouth. |
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a) Note the presentation of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Economic Development Agency CEO, Lucy Laitinen. |
Mayor Wise reminded Council that the Business Gala is to be held on Friday 1 November at the War Memorial Centre. This is part of the Napier 150 year celebrations.
Announcements by the management
Nil
Council resolution |
That the Draft Minutes of the Ordinary meeting held on 26 September 2024 be confirmed as a true and accurate record of the meeting.
|
1. Adoption of Annual Report 2023/24
Type of Report: |
Legal and Operational |
Legal Reference: |
Local Government Act 2002 |
Document ID: |
1801439 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Caroline Thomson, Chief Financial Officer Talia Foster, Financial Controller |
1.1 Purpose of Report
To present the Napier City Council Annual Report 2023/24 for adoption by Council.
At the meeting The officers presented the report and provided updates following the audit review. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a) Receives the report titled Adoption of Annual Report 2023/24 dated 31 October 2024 b) Note the Draft 2023/24 Annual Report was considered by the Prosperous Committee on 10 October 2024 and circulated to the Audit and Risk Committee for feedback. c) Note any qualifications or emphasis of matter paragraphs included in the Auditor’s report (which will be tabled at the meeting). d) Adopt the Annual Report for Napier City Council for 2023/24 (including the Statement of Compliance and Letter of Representation) subject to any grammatical and minor changes and any changes due to the requirements of the audit process.
|
|
1 Audit Opinion 2024 DOC ID 1806640 2 Annual Report 2024 DOC ID 1806641 3 Changes to the AR DOC ID 1806645 |
Type of Report: |
Procedural |
Legal Reference: |
Enter Legal Reference |
Document ID: |
1801346 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Anne Bradbury, Manager Community Strategies |
3.1 Purpose of Report In March 2024 the Council noted the draft Housing Strategy and directed Officers to bring the draft Housing Strategy back to Council for adoption in October 2024. This report outlines the changes from the draft Housing Strategy and seeks adoption of the Housing Strategy.
|
At the meeting Executive Director Community Services (Thunes Cloete) joined the officer to present the report. Officers provided the update that the implementation work in relation to this Strategy is to be ongoing, including through the District Plan and Future Development Strategy. The housing review is still being worked through at a regional level, though all councils are at different stages in the process. This Strategy will be presented to the Ngā Mānukanuka o te Iwi Committee at the rescheduled meeting. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a. Adopt the Housing Strategy as shown in Attachment 1.
ACTION: Page 7 of Strategy – the words ‘and social housing’ to be deleted ACTION: Clarify Focus area 3 relating to sufficient housing options |
4. Draft City Wide Reserve Management Plan
Type of Report: |
Legal and Operational |
Legal Reference: |
Reserves Act 1977 |
Document ID: |
1801302 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Amelia Longley, Parks Policy Planner |
4.1 Purpose of Report To seek Council’s approval of Draft City Wide Management Plan for public consultation.
|
At the meeting Team Leader Open Spaces (Tania Diack) joined the officer to present the report. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a. Approve i. Public Notification of the Draft City Wide Reserve Management Plan for consultation as per Section 41(6) of the Reserves Act subject to the amendments determined at the 31 October Council meeting. ACTION: Amend the Draft City Wide Reserve Management Plan as determined in the minutes. |
5. 2025 Napier City Council Meeting Schedule
Type of Report: |
Operational |
Legal Reference: |
Local Government Act 2002 |
Document ID: |
1776316 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Anna Eady, Team Leader Governance
|
5.1 Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to recommend that Council adopt the draft 2024 Schedule of Council and Committee meetings (Attachment 1) for Napier City Council, in accordance with clause 19 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002.
|
At the meeting The officer presented the report. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a) Adopt the Napier City Council 2025 Schedule of Council and Committee meetings (Doc Id 1778151). |
6. Information - Minutes of Joint Committees
Type of Report: |
Information |
Legal Reference: |
N/A |
Document ID: |
1787555 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Anna Eady, Team Leader Governance |
6.1 Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to receive unconfirmed minutes from Joint Committee meetings.
To view the full agendas relating to these minutes please refer to the following websites: · Hawke’s Bay Regional Council https://www.hbrc.govt.nz/our-council/meetings
|
At the meeting The officer presented the report. There were no questions. |
|||
Council resolution |
That Council: a) Receive for information the minutes of the following Joint Committee meeting held:
|
7. Action Points Register as at 14 October 2024
Type of Report: |
Operational |
Legal Reference: |
N/A |
Document ID: |
1801702 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Anna Eady, Team Leader Governance |
7.1 Purpose of Report The Action Points Register (Register) records the actions requested of Council officials in Council and Committee meetings. This report provides an extract from the Register as at 14 October 2024, for Council to note. It does not include action points that were requested in public excluded Council or Committee meetings. |
At the meeting The officer presented the report. There were no questions. |
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a. Note the extract from the Action Points Register as at 14 October 2024 |
Type of Report: |
Operational |
Legal Reference: |
Local Government Act 2002 |
Document ID: |
1801710 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Stephanie Murphy, Manager Strategy and Transformation
|
8.1 Purpose of Report Purpose of this report is to provide an update on the Housing Divestment Project; outline the recommended programme and procurement process for the project.
|
At the meeting Manager Community Strategies, (Anne Bradbury) joined the officer to present the report. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a) Receive the paper entitled “Housing Divestment”. b) Appoint Councillor Boag, Mayor Wise and Deputy Mayor Brosnan to the Housing Governance Advisory group. c) Delegate to the Housing Governance Advisory group to appoint an independent member to the Housing Expressions of Interest and Request for Proposals Evaluation Panel, with the support of the chair of the Audit and Risk Committee. d) Note the Housing Governance Advisory group has oversight of the Expressions of Interest and Request for Proposals Assessment criteria. e) Note Council retains the final decision on the housing delivery model and divestment. f) Approve officer’s recommendation to: i. Commence the two-step procurement process, including Stage 1, calling for Expressions of Interest; and Stage 2 Request for Proposals to deliver Napier City Council’s Three-Year Plan housing decisions. ii. Commence discussions with Abbeyfield NZ Incorporated (Hawke’s Bay branch) to facilitate delivering strategic housing priorities for Napier on the Greenmeadows East site, including site due diligence, feasibility and commercial terms. |
The meeting adjourned at 11.22am and reconvened at 11.38am
Item 12 on the agenda was taken out of order to enable Councillor Browne to be present.
12. Joint Waste Assessment and Waste Management and Minimisation Plan (WMMP)
Type of Report: |
Operational and Procedural |
|
Legal Reference: |
Local Government Act 2002 |
|
Document ID: |
1802709 |
|
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Stefni Wilson, Waste Minimisation Lead
|
|
12.1 Purpose of Report 1.1 The purpose of this report is to present the Joint Waste Assessment (Attachment 1) including the Hawke’s Bay Solid Waste Surveys April 2024 report (Attachment 2) and letter of support from the Medical Officer of Health (Attachment 3) for the Council to formally receive the documents. The documents were received by the Joint Waste Futures Project Steering Committee on 7 October 2024. This will allow both Councils to progress drafting the Joint Waste Management and Minimisation Plan (WMMP) for the period 2025 – 2031.
1.2 The Councils are required to review their WMMP every six years giving regard to Te Rautaki Para | Waste Strategy and the council’s most recent waste assessment and decide whether the current 2018 Waste Management and Minimisation Plan should be amended or revoked and a new plan substituted. This process must be completed by 15 September 2025.
1.3 The Joint Waste Assessment has been prepared to inform the review process for the Joint WMMP. The Joint Waste Assessment reflects the requirements of Te Rautaki Para | Waste Strategy.
1.4 This report concludes by recommending that the current 2018 WMMP is revoked based on the Waste Assessment and work is to commence on drafting a replacement WMMP. The current plan will remain active until the replacement plan is adopted.
1.5 This report also recommends that delegation is given to the Joint Waste Futures Project Steering Committee to adopt the final WMMP after the special consultative procedure is completed. |
|
|
At the meeting Acting Manager Environmental Solutions (Sarah Bowler), Waste Planning Manager, HDC (Angela Atkins) joined the officer in person, and Principal Waste Resource Recovery Consultant, Tonkin and Taylor (Kimberley Hope) joined the officer online to present the report. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a. Receive: i. the report titled Joint Waste Assessment and Waste Management and Minimisation Plan (WMMP) dated 31 October 2024. ii. the Joint Waste Assessment completed in accordance with section 51 of the Waste Minimisation Act 2008. iii. the feedback from Medical Officer of Health on the Joint Waste Assessment obtained on 20 September 2024. b. Approve: i. based on the completed Joint Waste Assessment that the Joint Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2018 -2024 be revoked, and a new plan substituted under section 50(3) of the Waste Minimisation Act 2008. [options are: continue, amend, or revoke and substitute WMMP] ii. to proceed with the review of the WMMP in accordance with section 44 of the Waste Minimisation Act 2008. c. Note: i. that a draft WMMP will be presented to the Joint Waste Futures Project Steering Committee and then both Councils for approval for consultation in December 2024. d. Receive: i. That the Joint Waste Futures Project Steering Committee has considered the Joint Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2018 in light of the draft Hastings District Council and Napier City Council Waste Assessment 2024 and agree to develop a replacement Joint Waste Management and Minimisation Plan. e. Approve: i. the delegation to the Joint Waste Futures Project Steering Committee to adopt the final Joint Waste Management and Minimisation Plan on behalf of both Councils after completing the consultation in line with the Special Consultative Procedure and the hearing of submissions by the committee.
|
|
1 NCC Waste Assessment presentation DOC ID 1806737 |
Councillor Browne left the meeting at 12:03pm.
9. Review of Gambling Venues Policy
Type of Report: |
Procedural |
Legal Reference: |
Gambling Act 2003 |
Document ID: |
1800137 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Michele Grigg, Senior Policy Analyst Jeriel Sajan, Policy Analyst |
9.1 Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to update Council on the review of Council’s Gambling Venues Policy and to seek approval to retain the Gambling Venues Policy in its current form. |
At the meeting The officers presented the report. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a. Note the information from the Officers’ review of the Gambling Venues Policy. b. Resolve to adopt the 2024 Gambling Venues Policy. c. Note that consultation is not required if the 2024 Gambling Venues Policy is retained in the form of the 2021 Policy (with some non-material editorial updates). Councillors Greig and Boag voted against the motion |
10. Napier Library Content & Collections Policy
Type of Report: |
Operational |
Legal Reference: |
N/A |
Document ID: |
1801708 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Nicola Saunders, Libraries Manager
|
10.1 Purpose of Report The Napier Libraries Content and Collections Policy consists of an overall statement of the library’s collecting intentions and guidelines for selection, maintenance, retention, and disposal of materials in the collections of Napier Libraries. |
At the meeting Manager Arts, Culture and Heritage (Elizabeth Caldwell) joined the officer to present the report. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a. Receive the ‘Napier Libraries Content & Collections Policy’ b. Approve the ‘Napier Libraries Content & Collections Policy’ |
11. Draft Freedom Camping Bylaw 2024
Type of Report: |
Legal |
Legal Reference: |
Local Government Act 2002 |
Document ID: |
1802028 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Jeriel Sajan, Policy Analyst Michele Grigg, Senior Policy Analyst |
11.1 Purpose of Report This report seeks Council’s adoption of the Statement of Proposal (SOP) and the Draft Freedom Camping Bylaw 2024 for public consultation and for officers to commence the special consultative procedure.
|
At the meeting The officers presented the report. Questions were answered clarifying;
|
|
Council resolution |
That Council: a. Adopts the Statement of Proposal and Draft Freedom Camping Bylaw 2024 for public consultation. |
|
1 Freedom Camping Presentation DOC ID 1807237 |
The meeting closed with a karakia at 12.33pm
Approved and adopted as a true and accurate record of the meeting.
Chairperson .............................................................................................................................
Date of approval ...................................................................................................................... |
Ordinary Meeting of Council
Open Minutes
Meeting Date: |
Thursday 7 November 2024 |
Time: |
2.00pm – 2:25pm |
Venue |
Large Exhibition Hall |
|
Livestreamed via Council’s Facebook page |
Present |
Chair: Mayor Wise Members: Councillors Boag, Browne, Chrystal, Crown, Greig, Mawson, McGrath, Price and Taylor. |
In Attendance |
Chief Executive (Louise Miller) Acting Executive Director Corporate Services (Caroline Thomson) [online] Executive Director Infrastructure Services (Russell Bond) Executive Director Community Services (Thunes Cloete) Manager Communications and Marketing (Julia Stevens) [online] Team Leader Governance (Anna Eady) Manager Water Reforms Transition (Andrew Lebioda) Manager Property (Bryan Faulknor) Carbon Emissions Advisor (Michelle Duncan) Event Manager (Kevin Murphy) Communications Manager (Jess Soutar Barron) Financial Analyst (Dirk Steyn) Executive Assistant to the Mayor (Vanessa Smith) |
Administration |
Governance Advisors (Jemma McDade) |
Ordinary Meeting of Council – Open Minutes
Table of Contents
Order of Business Page No.
Karakia
Apologies
Conflicts of interest
Public forum
Announcements by the Mayor
Announcements by the management
Confirmation of minutes
Agenda Items
1. Local Water Done Well
2. Licences for EV Chargers on Reserve Land
Minor matters
Resolution to Exclude the Public
Order of Business
The meeting opened with the Council Karakia.
Council resolution |
Councillors Price / Mawson That the apologies from Deputy Mayor Brosnan and Councillor Simpson be accepted. Carried |
Councillor Tareha did not attend the meeting.
Nil
Nil
Councillor Mawson provided a reminder that the Napier Monopoly game, as part of the Napier 150th celebrations, is now on sale and can be purchased at the Napier iSite and online at Monopoly | Our Place Napier.
Announcements by the management
Nil
There are no minutes to confirm.
Type of Report: |
Operational |
Legal Reference: |
N/A |
Document ID: |
1799798 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Andrew Lebioda, Manager Water Reforms Transition |
1.1 Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to recommend that Council endorse the continuation of the joint Hawke’s Bay Water work by moving to the development of a Business Case.
Business Case development follows the initial financial modelling undertaken to date, and will evaluate Hawke’s Bay water services delivery options (within council, council CCO or multi-council CCO), summarising key financial and non-financial impacts for each council and its ratepayers.
The Business Case will also provide a consistent basis for councils to make an informed decision on a preferred delivery model, ahead of the required public consultation. |
At the meeting Executive Director Infrastructure Services (Russell Bond) joined the officer to present the report. This paper follows on from the 22 October workshop with the modelling options to be refined into the business case. There were no questions. |
|
Council resolution |
Mayor Wise / Councillor Price That Council: a. Note i. the policy and legislative requirements under central Government’s Local Water Done Well framework for the future of water service delivery. ii. the initial scenario modelling work undertaken to date. b. Endorse the process to progress with the development of a Business Case. Carried |
2. Licences for EV Chargers on Reserve Land
Type of Report: |
Legal and Operational |
Legal Reference: |
Reserves Act 1977 |
Document ID: |
1806235 |
Reporting Officer/s & Unit: |
Bryan Faulknor, Manager Property Michelle Duncan, Carbon Emissions Advisor |
2.1 Purpose of Report To seek Council’s approval to grant a Licence to Meridian Energy Limited to install and operate Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Stations at two Council sites. Both are Reserve Land pursuant to the Reserves Act 1977, being the Aquarium Carpark on Marine Parade and the Flanders Avenue Carpark at Onekawa Park.
|
At the meeting The officers presented the report. Questions were answered clarifying:
|
|
Council resolution |
Mayor Wise / Councillor Crown That Council: a. Approve, as Administering Body, the granting of a Licence pursuant to Section 61 (1) of the Reserves Act 1977 to Meridian Energy Limited to install and operate an EV Charging Station on the National Aquarium of NZ carpark, Marine Parade. b. Approve, as Administering Body, the granting of a Licence pursuant to Section 54 (1) (d) of the Reserves Act 1977 to Meridian Energy Limited to install and operate an EV Charging Station on the Flanders Avenue Carpark, Onekawa Park. c. Approve, in exercise of the Ministerial consent (Under delegation from the Minister of Conservation) the granting of the above Licence relating to Onekawa Park. d. Resolve, to approve that the initial term of the Licences for both sites be for (10) ten years with one right of renewal (by agreement) of 5 years. Subject to an early exit clause being included in the Lease agreement for both locations. e. Note that, pursuant to Section 54 of the Reserves Act 1977, the proposed Licence relating to Onekawa Park is required to be publicly notified and should any objections or submissions be received then the matter will be required to be brought back to Council. Should no submissions or objections be received then the above resolution stands. f. Note that in granting the Licences Council is merely acting in its capacity as a Licensor and owner of the land. Any such approval shall not imply the consent of Council as a regulatory authority, and thus the installations are subject to Meridian obtaining all required regulatory consents. Carried Councillors McGrath and Mawson voted against the motion |
Nil
Resolution to Exclude the Public
Council resolution |
Councillors Taylor / Mawson That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting. Carried |
Agenda Items
1. Soundshell Concert - February 2025
2. Land Purchase
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public was excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution were as follows:
General subject of each matter to be considered. |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter. That the public conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information where the withholding of the information is necessary to: |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) to the passing of this resolution. 48(1)(a) That the public conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist: |
Plain English reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Agenda Items |
|||
1. Soundshell Concert - February 2025 |
7(2)(h) Enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities |
48(1)(a) That the public
conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting
would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good
reason for withholding would exist: |
To enable Council to conduct commerical activties and create a template for future events. |
2. Land Purchase |
7(2)(i) Enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) |
48(1)(a) That the public
conduct of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting
would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good
reason for withholding would exist: |
Allow negotiations to proceed with land owners regarding purchase price |
Public Excluded Text |
|||
Council has considered the public interest in the information above and balanced those interests with the reason(s) for withholding this information. This ensures Council has met the requirements for withholding information under section 7(2) of the Local Government and Official Information and Meetings Act 1987. |
The meeting closed at 2:25pm
Approved and adopted as a true and accurate record of the meeting.
Chairperson .............................................................................................................................
Date of approval ...................................................................................................................... |